9.12.2008
News

Controversial resolution of the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in its resolution No. 22/2007, addressed the differences between the loan agreement regulated by the Civil Code and the credit agreement pursuant to the Commercial Code. Pursuant to the Supreme Court, the difference is, inter alia, based on the subject of the agreement.

The subject of the credit agreement is expressly “financial means” whereas the subject of the loan agreement is “items determined pursuant to the type, in particular money”. Pursuant to the resolution of the Supreme Court, funds may be provided, for example, in cash, by transfer to an account or by payment of invoices to the debtor’s creditors, whereas money must be taken over by the debtor in cash. When adopting this interpretation, it would thus not be possible to provide a loan by interbank transfer of funds to an account, since such transfer would mean that a credit is provided.

Other articles

1.4.2025
News

We Succeeded in Another International Ranking

Just a week after the results of the Chambers Europe ranking were announced, we’re thrilled to share more great news – the renowned Legal 500 has published its annual overview of the leading law firms in the EMEA region, and we have once again confirmed our strong market position.
26.3.2025
News

We Confirmed Our Strong Standing in the Chambers Europe Rankings

We are pleased to announce that we have confirmed last year’s strongest-ever results in the Chambers Europe rankings, published by Chambers & Partners. In the 2025 edition, KŠB once again received excellent rankings in 11 categories. In addition, 13 of our colleagues received individual recognition—our best result in the firm’s history. This year’s recognition is crowned by a nomination for the prestigious Chambers Europe Awards 2025 for the best law firm in the Czech Republic.
5.3.2025
News

First Commentary on the Bonds Act Published

C.H. Beck has released the first-ever commentary on the Bonds Act, authored primarily by KŠB’s Jan Lasák, Jan Dědič, and Josef Kříž. Spanning over 700 pages, this comprehensive publication provides an in-depth interpretation of the Act’s individual provisions, drawing on the authors’ extensive expertise in corporate finance