KŠB Names New Partner and Counsel

Drahomír Tomašuk has been an attorney-at-law since 2003. He specializes in telecommunication law, personal data protection, banking, corporate law, including corporate groups, and administrative proceedings, including administrative justice. The international rating publication Legal 500 lists Drahomír as an expert in telecommunication law.
Martin Kubík has been an attorney-at-law since 2008. He specializes in securities and capital markets, mergers and acquisitions, restructuring, corporate law, including corporate groups, and personal data protection. Martin is also featured in the international rating publication Legal 500 as an expert in corporate law and mergers and acquisitions.
“Drahomír and Martin are both great attorneys with excellent prerequisites for their new positions at KŠB, not only because of their diligent work as attorneys but also for their active approach in further strengthening the good name for our law firm. I wish them the best in their new roles,” said KŠB managing partner Dagmar Dubecká.
In November, KŠB parted ways with Christian Blatchford, who chose a new career path. We would like to thank Christian for his long-term cooperation and wish him good luck and success in his new role.
Other articles
Four KŠB Lawyers Named to the TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business
We are pleased to announce that four KŠB lawyers have been named to this year’s TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business, which is compiled annually by the LEXELITE project and published by Euro magazine.
KŠB once again assists with ČEZ’s General Meeting
The KŠB team, consisting of Jana Guričová, Martin Kubík and Jan Lasák, led by Petr Kasík, provided legal support to ČEZ in connection with the preparation and conduct of its Annual General Meeting.
DNS – What Now Constitutes a Commonly Available Supply or Service
Professional literature has traditionally compared a dynamic purchasing system (DNS) to a standard online purchase. However, in its judgment No. 22 As 15/2025-65 of 12 May 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court significantly refined this understanding.