13.6.2024
News
Environmental Law

Successful Complaint to the European Commission against the Czech Republic and EKO-KOM Concerning Packaging Waste

KSB, on behalf of its client REMA AOS, has successfully brought a complaint to the European Commission to investigate whether the Czech Republic, acting through the Ministry of the Environment, violated its obligations under EU law by creating an anti-competitive environment in the packaging sector in favour of EKO-KOM.

KSB’s competition desk – Pavel Dejl and Martin Vráb – and environmental desk – Tomáš Sequens and Petra Mirovská – teamed up to file the complaint on behalf of REMA AOS, which is an example of KSB’s interdisciplinary overlap and successful cooperation within the firm. REMA AOS, like a number of other unsuccessful applicants, attempted to break EKO-KOM's 20-year de facto monopoly and become the next authorised packaging company to provide take-back and recovery of packaging waste on the Czech market. However, in the authorisation procedure conducted by the Ministry of the Environment, it encountered insurmountable obstacles, which were an indication that the measures taken by the Czech Republic in favour of EKO-KOM were causing very serious distortions of competition on the market and were completely preventing undertakings from emerging and efficiently competing with EKO-KOM.

In response to the complaint, the European Commission published a press release on 11 June 2024, in which it reported on the investigation and its preliminary conclusion that the conditions required for obtaining authorisation, including the financial and contractual requirements, together with EKO-KOM's ability to influence the authorisation process, created significant barriers to the entry of new competitors into the market. EU law prohibits Member States from adopting or maintaining in force measures that are contrary to EU treaties and EU competition rules, including the prohibition of abuse of dominant positions by monopoly undertakings that have been granted special or exclusive rights to operate in a particular sector.

Margrethe Vestager, the Commission's Executive Vice-President responsible for competition, said in the press release: "The Czech market for packaging waste collection and recovery has been dominated by the incumbent operator for more than two decades. We are concerned that Czech measures have prevented entry of rival companies, with a consequent negative impact on prices, quality, innovation and choice. Therefore, we have sent a letter of Formal Notice to Czechia. Ensuring effective competition is essential for achieving a sustainable and circular economy, one of the main building blocks of the European Green Deal."

We are proud to have been able to contribute to this important step towards ensuring fairer competition in the Czech Republic in the field of environmental protection.

Other articles

1.4.2025
News

We Succeeded in Another International Ranking

Just a week after the results of the Chambers Europe ranking were announced, we’re thrilled to share more great news – the renowned Legal 500 has published its annual overview of the leading law firms in the EMEA region, and we have once again confirmed our strong market position.
26.3.2025
News

We Confirmed Our Strong Standing in the Chambers Europe Rankings

We are pleased to announce that we have confirmed last year’s strongest-ever results in the Chambers Europe rankings, published by Chambers & Partners. In the 2025 edition, KŠB once again received excellent rankings in 11 categories. In addition, 13 of our colleagues received individual recognition—our best result in the firm’s history. This year’s recognition is crowned by a nomination for the prestigious Chambers Europe Awards 2025 for the best law firm in the Czech Republic.
5.3.2025
News

First Commentary on the Bonds Act Published

C.H. Beck has released the first-ever commentary on the Bonds Act, authored primarily by KŠB’s Jan Lasák, Jan Dědič, and Josef Kříž. Spanning over 700 pages, this comprehensive publication provides an in-depth interpretation of the Act’s individual provisions, drawing on the authors’ extensive expertise in corporate finance