7.7.2008
•
Publications
Prospectus for the Public Offering of Securities in Europe
Petr Kasík and Vlastimil Pihera contributed a chapter dealing with the transposition of the Prospectus Directive into Czech law to Prospectus for the Public Offering of Securities in Europe, Volume I. The title was published by Cambridge University Press as a part of the “Law Practitioner Series” and contains a summary of the provisions of Directive No. 2003/71/EC on the prospectus and on the transposition thereof in fifteen EU Member States. The title was authored by lawyers from major European law firms. More information
Other articles
12.6.2026
•
News
Four KŠB Lawyers Named to the TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business
We are pleased to announce that four KŠB lawyers have been named to this year’s TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business, which is compiled annually by the LEXELITE project and published by Euro magazine.
We are pleased to announce that four KŠB lawyers have been named to this year’s TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business, which is compiled annually by the LEXELITE project and published by Euro magazine.
2.6.2026
•
News
KŠB once again assists with ČEZ’s General Meeting
The KŠB team, consisting of Jana Guričová, Martin Kubík and Jan Lasák, led by Petr Kasík, provided legal support to ČEZ in connection with the preparation and conduct of its General Meeting.
The KŠB team, consisting of Jana Guričová, Martin Kubík and Jan Lasák, led by Petr Kasík, provided legal support to ČEZ in connection with the preparation and conduct of its Annual General Meeting.
2.6.2026
•
News
DNS – What Now Constitutes a Commonly Available Supply or Service
Professional literature has traditionally compared a dynamic purchasing system (DNS) to a standard online purchase. However, in its judgment No. 22 As 15/2025-65 of 12 May 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court significantly refined this understanding.
Professional literature has traditionally compared a dynamic purchasing system (DNS) to a standard online purchase. However, in its judgment No. 22 As 15/2025-65 of 12 May 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court significantly refined this understanding.
