8.4.2009
News
Competition

Agrofert’s take over of Agropol permitted

Kocián Šolc Balaštík successfully represented Agrofert Holding, a.s. in proceedings before the Anti-Monopoly Authority regarding Agrofert’s merger with Agropol. The Anti-Monopoly Authority permitted the merger subject to predefined conditions.

KSB counseled Agrofert throughout the entire proceedings that commenced in October of last year, including negotiations with the Anti-Monopoly Authority on the scope and structure of pro-competition obligations to be undertaken by both merging competitors who are major players on the agricultural commodity market.

The Agrofert Group comprises production and commercial companies engaged in agriculture, food and chemical industries and it is one largest corporate groups in the Czech Republic.

Other articles

12.6.2026
News

Four KŠB Lawyers Named to the TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business

We are pleased to announce that four KŠB lawyers have been named to this year’s TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business, which is compiled annually by the LEXELITE project and published by Euro magazine.

We are pleased to announce that four KŠB lawyers have been named to this year’s TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business, which is compiled annually by the LEXELITE project and published by Euro magazine.

2.6.2026
News

KŠB once again assists with ČEZ’s General Meeting

The KŠB team, consisting of Jana Guričová, Martin Kubík and Jan Lasák, led by Petr Kasík, provided legal support to ČEZ in connection with the preparation and conduct of its General Meeting.

The KŠB team, consisting of Jana Guričová, Martin Kubík and Jan Lasák, led by Petr Kasík, provided legal support to ČEZ in connection with the preparation and conduct of its Annual General Meeting.

2.6.2026
News

DNS – What Now Constitutes a Commonly Available Supply or Service

Professional literature has traditionally compared a dynamic purchasing system (DNS) to a standard online purchase. However, in its judgment No. 22 As 15/2025-65 of 12 May 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court significantly refined this understanding.

Professional literature has traditionally compared a dynamic purchasing system (DNS) to a standard online purchase. However, in its judgment No. 22 As 15/2025-65 of 12 May 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court significantly refined this understanding.