11.1.2016
News
Corporate law

KŠB Advised Tiger Global Management on the Sale of a Minority Stake in Seznam.cz

KŠB advised New York-based Tiger Global Management group on a minority stake transfer deal in which the target company Seznam.cz, a leading Czech online player, acquired shares in itself from Tiger Holding Four and Mirua International.

KŠB’s advice focused on Czech corporate and contract law issues, including pledge aspects. The challenge was to harmonize the interests of both minority shareholders and meet a very tight deadline.

Tiger Holding Four and Mirua International have held a 30% stake in Seznam.cz since 2007. Seznam.cz, whose online website bears the same name, will thus cease to have a minority shareholder after 15 years. Founder Ivo Lukačovič is now the only beneficial owner of the company. Seznam.cz, which is the most visited Czech website, is famous for its innovative approach and ability to compete with major worldwide browsers.

Other articles

12.6.2026
News

Four KŠB Lawyers Named to the TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business

We are pleased to announce that four KŠB lawyers have been named to this year’s TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business, which is compiled annually by the LEXELITE project and published by Euro magazine.

We are pleased to announce that four KŠB lawyers have been named to this year’s TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business, which is compiled annually by the LEXELITE project and published by Euro magazine.

2.6.2026
News

KŠB once again assists with ČEZ’s General Meeting

The KŠB team, consisting of Jana Guričová, Martin Kubík and Jan Lasák, led by Petr Kasík, provided legal support to ČEZ in connection with the preparation and conduct of its General Meeting.

The KŠB team, consisting of Jana Guričová, Martin Kubík and Jan Lasák, led by Petr Kasík, provided legal support to ČEZ in connection with the preparation and conduct of its Annual General Meeting.

2.6.2026
News

DNS – What Now Constitutes a Commonly Available Supply or Service

Professional literature has traditionally compared a dynamic purchasing system (DNS) to a standard online purchase. However, in its judgment No. 22 As 15/2025-65 of 12 May 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court significantly refined this understanding.

Professional literature has traditionally compared a dynamic purchasing system (DNS) to a standard online purchase. However, in its judgment No. 22 As 15/2025-65 of 12 May 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court significantly refined this understanding.