28.3.2022
News
Corporate law

Advising on Squeeze-Out of O2 Czech Republic’s Minority Shareholders

KSB's team (Petr Kasík, Martin Kubík, Josef Kříž and Filip Řehák) advised PPF Group on the approximately year-long squeeze-out of O2 Czech Republic’s minority shareholders.

KSB advised PPF on all major steps in the squeeze-out process, which involved the exit of one of the largest Czech listed companies from the public stock markets. The transaction was also unique because the decision-making of O2’s general meeting (with several thousand shareholders) took the form of per rollam voting as a result of the Covid pandemic restrictions.

The squeeze-out followed KSB’s long-standing advice on O2’s corporate affairs, including participation in the overall corporate restructuring of the telecommunications operator within the PPF Group, which also involved a spin-off (and subsequent squeeze-out) of the telecommunications network operator CETIN in 2015.

Other articles

12.6.2026
News

Four KŠB Lawyers Named to the TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business

We are pleased to announce that four KŠB lawyers have been named to this year’s TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business, which is compiled annually by the LEXELITE project and published by Euro magazine.

We are pleased to announce that four KŠB lawyers have been named to this year’s TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business, which is compiled annually by the LEXELITE project and published by Euro magazine.

2.6.2026
News

KŠB once again assists with ČEZ’s General Meeting

The KŠB team, consisting of Jana Guričová, Martin Kubík and Jan Lasák, led by Petr Kasík, provided legal support to ČEZ in connection with the preparation and conduct of its General Meeting.

The KŠB team, consisting of Jana Guričová, Martin Kubík and Jan Lasák, led by Petr Kasík, provided legal support to ČEZ in connection with the preparation and conduct of its Annual General Meeting.

2.6.2026
News

DNS – What Now Constitutes a Commonly Available Supply or Service

Professional literature has traditionally compared a dynamic purchasing system (DNS) to a standard online purchase. However, in its judgment No. 22 As 15/2025-65 of 12 May 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court significantly refined this understanding.

Professional literature has traditionally compared a dynamic purchasing system (DNS) to a standard online purchase. However, in its judgment No. 22 As 15/2025-65 of 12 May 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court significantly refined this understanding.