Remuneration of directors of listed companies

The Commission calls for limitation of severance payments, namely by a stated fixed amount of money or by a sum of money for a fixed number of years of duties. Generally the amount of severance payments should not be higher than the fixed component of pay for two years. Severance payments should not be paid as a "reward for failure" or if the director terminates employment of his or her own accord.
Remuneration in shares or options should be linked more to the long-term value of a company. Consequently there should be a certain period during which the director is not entitled to exercise awarded share options or any other right to acquire shares. The Commission states this should be at least a three-year period. However, a director would be required to keep a certain number of shares on a compulsory basis until the end of his or her mandate; the Recommendation considers as appropriate, for example, the number of shares corresponding to twice the value of total annual remuneration, including fixed and variable components. Options on shares should not be used to pay non-executive members or supervisory directors. Companies should publish particular aspects of remuneration policy for members of boards in the form of a statement on remuneration. The content of this information should be extended and available on the website of listed companies.
Other articles
KŠB radila J&T IB and Capital Markets při dluhopisovém programu 3M FUND MSI SICAV
Kocián Šolc Balaštík poskytla právní poradenství společnosti J&T IB and Capital Markets, a.s. jako aranžérovi při přípravě základního prospektu dluhopisového programu společnosti 3M FUND MSI SICAV a.s.
Shortlist Legal 500 Central & Eastern Europe Awards 2026
KŠBand partner Pavel Dejl have been shortlisted for the prestigious Legal 500Central & Eastern Europe Awards 2026.
KŠB achieved a significant victory in one of the most closely watched cases concerning a review of the adequacy of the consideration paid in a squeeze-out of minority shareholders
The Municipal Court in Prague, in the first instance, dismissed the claims of former minority shareholders of PFNonwovens a.s., who challenged the adequacy of the consideration paid during the squeeze-out carried out in March 2021 and sought to have it increased by up to double the amount.