24.7.2008
News

Amendments to the act on reserves

Clear provision will be made for the creation of reserves by successor companies following a corporate transformation. The successor company will continue to create reserves and make provisions/ adjustments as commenced by the company being split up on the conditions that would have applied to such company had the transformation not taken place, but only insofar as such creation of reserves pertains to the portion of business assets passing to the successor company.

The rules on creation of provisions (adjustments) for receivables (20%-100%) shall be tightened where the nominal value of such receivables exceeds 200 000 CZK. The tax payer can create provisions (adjustments) for the receivables if it duly participates in tax proceedings (including arbitration, judicial and administrative proceedings) and takes due and timely steps necessary to exercise its rights.

Other articles

12.6.2026
News

Four KŠB Lawyers Named to the TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business

We are pleased to announce that four KŠB lawyers have been named to this year’s TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business, which is compiled annually by the LEXELITE project and published by Euro magazine.

We are pleased to announce that four KŠB lawyers have been named to this year’s TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business, which is compiled annually by the LEXELITE project and published by Euro magazine.

2.6.2026
News

KŠB once again assists with ČEZ’s General Meeting

The KŠB team, consisting of Jana Guričová, Martin Kubík and Jan Lasák, led by Petr Kasík, provided legal support to ČEZ in connection with the preparation and conduct of its General Meeting.

The KŠB team, consisting of Jana Guričová, Martin Kubík and Jan Lasák, led by Petr Kasík, provided legal support to ČEZ in connection with the preparation and conduct of its Annual General Meeting.

2.6.2026
News

DNS – What Now Constitutes a Commonly Available Supply or Service

Professional literature has traditionally compared a dynamic purchasing system (DNS) to a standard online purchase. However, in its judgment No. 22 As 15/2025-65 of 12 May 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court significantly refined this understanding.

Professional literature has traditionally compared a dynamic purchasing system (DNS) to a standard online purchase. However, in its judgment No. 22 As 15/2025-65 of 12 May 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court significantly refined this understanding.