29.10.2014
News

KŠB Institute Supports New Private Law Conference

The new Civil Code as viewed by lawyers, judges, members of academia and corporate representatives will be the main topic of the New Private Law conference. KŠB Institute – KŠB’s education subsidiary – will lend support to the event as a conference partner.

The third annual conference held by EPRAVO.CZ in partnership with the Czech Bar Association and under the auspices of Czech Justice Minister Helena Válková will hold a talk by Professor Jan Dědič, a KŠB partner and one of the co-authors of the new legislation. Professor Dědič will discuss how businesses have managed to adapt to the re-enactment, particularly to the Corporations Act.

The conference will be held in the Clarion Hotel in Prague-Vysočany on 25 November 2014.

Other articles

28.1.2026
News

KŠB at EMUN’s Investment Outlook 2026 Conference in Prague

Kocián Šolc Balaštík (KŠB) continues its active cooperation with key partners in the investment and financial sectors, most recently as a partner of EMUN’s Investment Outlook 2026 conference.

Kocián Šolc Balaštík (KŠB) continues its active cooperation with key partners in the investment and financial sectors, most recently as a partner of EMUN’s Investment Outlook 2026 conference.

22.1.2026
Corporate law

KŠB advises the National Development Bank on the integration of the Czech Export Bank

KŠB poskytla právní poradenství Národní rozvojové bance, a.s. v souvislosti s integrací České exportní banky, a.s., do skupiny NRB.

KŠB advised the National Development Bank (Národní rozvojová banka, a.s.) on the integration of the Czech Export Bank (Česká exportní banka, a.s.) into the NRB group.

13.1.2026
News

When Excessive Prevention Does More Harm Than Good

At the end of 2025, the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic ruled that the preventive retention of traffic and location data under the Electronic Communications Act infringes the rights of the persons whose data is concerned.

At the end of 2025, the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic ruled that the preventive retention of traffic and location data under the Electronic Communications Act infringes the rights of the persons whose data is concerned.