10.11.2011
Publications

“Carlsbad Lottery” 2.0

On 7 October 2011 Lidové noviny’s Law & Justice section featured the reflections of Martina Parusová Zímová and Christian Blatchford on the drawing of lots and whether such a practice is a legitimate way to reduce the number of bidders in public tenders. These two KSB lawyers do not consider the method transparent and non-discriminatory and believe it should therefore be removed from the Public Contracts Act.

A draft amendment to the Public Contracts Act abolishing the practice of drawing lots was recently passed by the Chamber of Deputies and is awaiting the decision of the Senate and the President.

  • For the entire article (in Czech only), click here

Other articles

12.6.2026
News

Four KŠB Lawyers Named to the TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business

We are pleased to announce that four KŠB lawyers have been named to this year’s TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business, which is compiled annually by the LEXELITE project and published by Euro magazine.

We are pleased to announce that four KŠB lawyers have been named to this year’s TOP 100 Women in the Czech Legal Business, which is compiled annually by the LEXELITE project and published by Euro magazine.

2.6.2026
News

KŠB once again assists with ČEZ’s General Meeting

The KŠB team, consisting of Jana Guričová, Martin Kubík and Jan Lasák, led by Petr Kasík, provided legal support to ČEZ in connection with the preparation and conduct of its General Meeting.

The KŠB team, consisting of Jana Guričová, Martin Kubík and Jan Lasák, led by Petr Kasík, provided legal support to ČEZ in connection with the preparation and conduct of its Annual General Meeting.

2.6.2026
News

DNS – What Now Constitutes a Commonly Available Supply or Service

Professional literature has traditionally compared a dynamic purchasing system (DNS) to a standard online purchase. However, in its judgment No. 22 As 15/2025-65 of 12 May 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court significantly refined this understanding.

Professional literature has traditionally compared a dynamic purchasing system (DNS) to a standard online purchase. However, in its judgment No. 22 As 15/2025-65 of 12 May 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court significantly refined this understanding.