Concerning preclusion in tax law. Daňový expert, No. 5/2008
Annotation to the article
The Supreme Administrative Court is the supreme court body in matters falling under powers of courts in administrative justice and provides protection of public subjective laws of individuals and legal entities. The extended panel of judges can adopt fundamental resolutions to ensure uniformity of the decision-making activities of the Supreme Administrative Court. In late 2007, the extended panel of judges of the Supreme Administrative Court, as part of unifying the decision-making activities, provided comments on the interpretation of preclusion periods in the field of taxation. Pursuant to Resolution No. 9 Afs 86/2007-161 of the Supreme Administrative Court, the assessment of tax after expiration of the preclusion period will only be taken into consideration on the basis of an objection filed by a tax entity. The article analyses in detail the relevant resolution of the Supreme Administrative Court and adopts a relatively critical attitude to the conclusions arrived at by the court. The author also analyses the terms “triviality” and “invalidity” in tax law and critically compares the conclusions adopted by the Supreme Administrative Court with those of the Constitutional Court on the possibilities of filing an objection against the expiration of a preclusion period that would otherwise result in illegal extra tax.
Other articles
KŠB achieved a significant victory in one of the most closely watched cases concerning a review of the adequacy of the consideration paid in a squeeze-out of minority shareholders
The Municipal Court in Prague, in the first instance, dismissed the claims of former minority shareholders of PFNonwovens a.s., who challenged the adequacy of the consideration paid during the squeeze-out carried out in March 2021 and sought to have it increased by up to double the amount.
KŠB podpořila letošní SVOČ na Právnické fakultě UK
Advokátní kancelář Kocián Šolc Balaštík se letos stala partnerem Studentské vědecké a odborné činnosti (SVOČ) pořádané Právnickou fakultou Univerzity Karlovy.
Je stabilita stavebního práva reálným cílem?
Advokátní kancelář KŠB byla odborným garantem diskuse legalwebu s názvem „Stabilita stavebního práva – iluze, nebo reálný cíl?“, která na konci dubna přivedla ke společnému stolu zástupce veřejné správy, developerů, profesních svazů i dalších odborníků ze stavební praxe. Debata se zaměřila na aktuálně projednávané změny nového stavebního zákona (NSZ) a jejich očekávané dopady.
