Judicature by the Constitutional Court Applicable to Malice in Law
The Constitutional Court ruled that although tax law did not use the term “malice in law”, this did not mean that malice in law or circumvention of law did not occur.
The case in question involved a family that established an association to support and develop sport, cultural and artistic activities of its members, better their education and protect the environment and animals. However, the association in fact funded common needs and interests of its members instead; no other use of funds was proven.
The court considered the following situation to constitute malice in law: the only members of the association were relatives who covered otherwise non-tax costs for their own needs via the association while such costs are not generally tax deductible. Therefore, the funds provided to the association could not have been deemed to constitute a “tax-deductible donation” pursuant to Section 15, subsection 8 of the Income Tax Act.
Other articles
KŠB on Legalweb: Ivo Průša, Jana Guričová and Ján Béreš on creativity, stability and innovation in KŠB
Kocián Šolc Balaštík has been featured in a recent in-depth interview published by Legalweb, with contributions from partner Ivo Průša and counsels Jana Guričová and Ján Béreš. The interview offers insight into the firm’s core values and its direction in an evolving legal market.
Digital Services Act Back in Spotlight
Do you know what Wikipedia and Pornhub have in common? That's right, both are large online platforms designated by the Commission under the Digital Services Act (along with Booking.com, Google Maps, TikTok, Zalando, WhatsApp, and others). The list of very large online platforms and very large search engines, as defined in Article 33(4) of European Regulation 2022/2065 on digital services, was published in the Official Journal of the EU on March 11, 2026.
Kateřina Štěpánková k flexinovele zákoníku práce v anketě Legalwebu
Advokátka KŠB Kateřina Štěpánková poskytla rozhovor odbornému portálu Legalweb v rámci ankety věnované zkušenostem s tzv. flexinovelou zákoníku práce. Ta přinesla od roku 2025 řadu významných změn v pracovněprávních vztazích, například úpravu běhu výpovědní doby nebo prodloužení maximální délky zkušební doby.
