Judicature by the Constitutional Court Applicable to Malice in Law
The Constitutional Court ruled that although tax law did not use the term “malice in law”, this did not mean that malice in law or circumvention of law did not occur.
The case in question involved a family that established an association to support and develop sport, cultural and artistic activities of its members, better their education and protect the environment and animals. However, the association in fact funded common needs and interests of its members instead; no other use of funds was proven.
The court considered the following situation to constitute malice in law: the only members of the association were relatives who covered otherwise non-tax costs for their own needs via the association while such costs are not generally tax deductible. Therefore, the funds provided to the association could not have been deemed to constitute a “tax-deductible donation” pursuant to Section 15, subsection 8 of the Income Tax Act.
Other articles
KSB Presents Key Digital Obligations for 2026 at Business Breakfast in Ostrava
On 24 September 2026, Kocián Šolc Baláštík (KSB), in cooperation with the Regional Chamber of Commerce of the Moravian-Silesian Region, hosted a business breakfast under the title "Digital Obligations 2026: Cybersecurity, E-commerce and Accessibility Under the Microscope". The event was held at Futureum in the Dolní Vítkovice area of Ostrava.
KŠB advises J&T Banka, Unicredit, PPF Banka, Česká spořitelna and Komerční banka on the next phase of EMMA Capital's bond programme
KŠB is continuing its previous legal advisory work for J&T, Unicredit and Česká spořitelna on the bond programme of the investment group EMMA Capital, which is recording strong investor interest on the market again in the second half of the year.
KŠB secures landmark Supreme Court ruling on size premiums in squeeze-out valuations
Kocián Šolc Balaštík (KŠB) has obtained a significant victory before the Czech Supreme Court in a dispute over the fairness of the consideration paid to minority shareholders in Léčebné lázně Mariánské Lázně a.s. In its judgment in case no. 27 Cdo 1678/2025, the Court dismissed the claimants’ appeal and upheld the lower courts’ decisions. KŠB lawyers Radka Felgrová and Vlastimil Pihera represented the company and its majority shareholder.
