6.6.2011
•
Publications
Defence even against inspectors available
On 6 June 2011 the Law & Justice supplement of Lidové noviny published an article on abbreviated construction proceedings by KSB lawyers Dana Čiháková and Petr Sedlatý. Even though the abbreviated construction proceedings were introduced in an attempt to simplify approval proceedings, legislative loopholes have resulted in fairly broad misuse. But recently, the Municipal Court in Prague issued a breakthrough judgment eliminating such misuse to a certain extent.
- For the entire article, please click here (in Czech only)
Other articles
28.5.2026
•
Capital markets
KŠB radila J&T IB and Capital Markets při dluhopisovém programu 3M FUND MSI SICAV
Kocián Šolc Balaštík poskytla právní poradenství společnosti J&T IB and Capital Markets, a.s. jako aranžérovi při přípravě základního prospektu dluhopisového programu společnosti 3M FUND MSI SICAV a.s.
Kocián Šolc Balaštík poskytla právní poradenství společnosti J&T IB and Capital Markets, a.s. jako aranžérovi při přípravě základního prospektu dluhopisového programu společnosti 3M FUND MSI SICAV a.s.
26.5.2026
•
News
Shortlist Legal 500 Central & Eastern Europe Awards 2026
KŠB and partner Pavel Dejl have been shortlisted for the prestigious Legal 500 Central & Eastern Europe Awards 2026.
KŠBand partner Pavel Dejl have been shortlisted for the prestigious Legal 500Central & Eastern Europe Awards 2026.
25.5.2026
•
Disputes
KŠB achieved a significant victory in one of the most closely watched cases concerning a review of the adequacy of the consideration paid in a squeeze-out of minority shareholders
The Municipal Court in Prague, in the first instance, dismissed the claims of former minority shareholders of PFNonwovens a.s., who challenged the adequacy of the consideration paid during the squeeze-out carried out in March 2021 and sought to have it increased by up to double the amount.
The Municipal Court in Prague, in the first instance, dismissed the claims of former minority shareholders of PFNonwovens a.s., who challenged the adequacy of the consideration paid during the squeeze-out carried out in March 2021 and sought to have it increased by up to double the amount.
