European Commission Presents Omnibus I and II legislative packages
The proposals have generated a great deal of interest among companies. If the proposals are adopted, up to 80% of companies that were to be subject to sustainability reporting will be exempted from this obligation, while those companies that remain under the obligation will be given more time to comply.
Taxonomic reporting will remain an obligation for large companies only. The requirement to demonstrate sustainability due diligence in the supply chain is to be systematically targeted at direct business partners.
Moreover, it is proposed to exempt up to 90% of importers from CBAM - the carbon border offsetting mechanism.
While some fear that the proposed legislation will undermine the sustainability objectives themselves through oversimplification, others claim that it is a return to the original purpose of ESG and carbon footprint measuring as a management tool for analysing risks and opportunities.
It is important to remember that these are still only proposals that will have to be discussed by the European Parliament and the Council. In the end, the final form may differ from the proposals.
Other articles
KŠB achieved a significant victory in one of the most closely watched cases concerning a review of the adequacy of the consideration paid in a squeeze-out of minority shareholders
The Municipal Court in Prague, in the first instance, dismissed the claims of former minority shareholders of PFNonwovens a.s., who challenged the adequacy of the consideration paid during the squeeze-out carried out in March 2021 and sought to have it increased by up to double the amount.
KŠB podpořila letošní SVOČ na Právnické fakultě UK
Advokátní kancelář Kocián Šolc Balaštík se letos stala partnerem Studentské vědecké a odborné činnosti (SVOČ) pořádané Právnickou fakultou Univerzity Karlovy.
Je stabilita stavebního práva reálným cílem?
Advokátní kancelář KŠB byla odborným garantem diskuse legalwebu s názvem „Stabilita stavebního práva – iluze, nebo reálný cíl?“, která na konci dubna přivedla ke společnému stolu zástupce veřejné správy, developerů, profesních svazů i dalších odborníků ze stavební praxe. Debata se zaměřila na aktuálně projednávané změny nového stavebního zákona (NSZ) a jejich očekávané dopady.
